Urgent: Tax Issue Facing Florida MSPs

UPDATE! We are hearing from MSPs all across the Country that are facing the same tax issue. Please read Celia's blog updating you on the steps we've taken to help MSPs with this issue: http://www.mspalliance.com/blogs/urgent-tax-issue-facing-florida-msps#comment-396 

If you are a MSP practicing in the state of Florida please contact the MSPAlliance today. We have heard (from one of our members) that there may be a push by the Florida Department of Revenue to collect taxes in a way that would unfairly punish MSPs in that state. 

MSPAlliance is working diligently to investigate this and see what can be done but we need to speak to a few more MSPs (member or not) about what is actually going on.

Please contact us at info@mspalliance.com or 530-891-1340  

Comments

MSPs across the Country reporting same tax issue as Florida MSPs

MSPs from across the Country are now reporting the same problem as MSPs in Florida. What the MSPAlliance has identified is a need for mass education; both for MSPs and tax auditors across the Nation. The MSPAlliance has taken swift action and has done the following:

1) Help from CPAs: We have retained the services of one of the largest international CPA firms in the Nation to offer our members free consultation. Later today we will set up an email hotline so that members may contact the firm confidentially. 

2) Legislative Affairs Committee: We have formed a Legislative Affairs Committee. The committee is comprised of attorneys, CPAs and MSPs; all have existing relationships with key lawmakers and auditors. 

3) Reaching out to Vendors: We have heard from many vendors offering their help in the matter. Most notably Arnie Bellinni of ConnectWise; he and Charles Weaver feverishly exchanged a flurry of emails over the weekend and will be speaking today. 

Look for more information TODAY on the email hotline, name and contact information of the CPA firm and members of the Legislative affairs committee.  

We are really working as hard for you as we can; please bear with us :-)

Celia Weaver, Co-Founder- MSPAlliance 

Washington Tax on Services

Just got this in from a member in Washington. 

www.dor.wa.gov/digitalproducts 

The two parts that I determined apply...

From a member:  The two parts that I determined apply in the 2009 Digital Products tax are:

  1. Online data backup
  2. Email scanning services such as MX Logic

Services tax in WA is impossible to understand, especially when you consider we have as much of an obligation to NOT TAX when we’re not supposed to.We add sales tax to our Managed Services agreements.Now add the fact that WA uses destination based sales tax.  If our client has some users in WA and other users out of state receiving services (digital products), we technically only need to tax for the portion used in WA state?!?!?!Rex

SIC codes for Managed Service Industry

We received this from a member:

"Please advise of the US Standard Industry Codes (SIC) for this relative Managed Service Industry.Currently in Florida SIC codes 7381, 7382, are taxable. Please refer to Florida Dept of Rev, GT-800018 7/09, Sales & Use Tax on Detective, Burglar Protection & Other Protection Services. The 1987 SIC Industries list shows SERVICES codes for related computer services as: 7371, 7372, 7373, 7374, 7375, 7376, 7377, 7378, 7379."

Taxes on Services

First of all, when crafting new pricing models, we should run them by a CPA to determine the tax consequences.  Each state has it's own way of handling taxes and when you are selling on the Internet or across state lines, you must consider taxes as it get's more complicated.

Please consult your CPA!  Find one that understands the service industry and consults with businesses - not just focuses on tax season or audits.

Below are some things you will want to discuss with your CPA so that they understand the unusual scenarios that your business encounters.  I have condensed them in to "rule of thumb" advice we have received over the years...

 

  • When selling product to a customer where ownership of the product changes hands then sales tax should be paid.
  • Tax should be paid in the State where the sale occurred.  This is not always the State where the customer is, it many times depends on where the product is shipped when it is purchased from the vendor.
  • Consider whether you are being asked to double dip.  Are you paying sales tax and then also charging sales tax again to the customer, collecting it and paying the state so that the tax is paid twice?
  • When "bundling" hardware and service together, does ownership of the device change hands or is it a rental?
  • Historically, service has not been taxed.  Professional consulting companies that charge by the hour (CPA, Attorney, Engineers) do not pay sales tax on service hours.  How similar is your business to this model?  If you convert your time to a monthly "retainer" that includes a certain minimum number of hours of consulting, then charge by the hour for additional time spent, then you are very similar and should not be required to pay tax on your time.  After all, you are paying payroll tax and FICA and City tax and State tax on your employees, right?

Again, please consult with your CPA.  If you do not have one then get one.Hardware as a service and software as a service are not new ideas.  The ASP model has been around for many years.  You are essentially "renting" your purchased hardware and software (that you have paid sales tax on) to others.  It is not a pricing game to get around sales tax - it is a way for small businesses to benefit from the expertise that your firm offers in a right sized and utilitarian manner. The hosted datacenter space, software and hardware depreciates and must be replaced over time.  MSP's have real costs to providing not only the expertise (payroll tax) but also the equipment and software (sales tax) that is collected by the government.  Taxes must be paid and they must be paid in a consistent manner, but to ask that they be paid in multiples is oppressive.  If you are being asked to do this, consult your CPA and Attorney.             Michael Backers, P.E.              President, Ordovician Group 

Excellent Advice!

That was very good and sound advice Mr. Backers. Thank you so much for your insight.  

Pure-play shakedown

I went through this 10 years ago at my old company. We went through all of the exact same dissections and nuances of language. It seemed like they had never heard of anybody doing business like us!  But after almost a year of living with the imminent fear of closing our doors because of 3+ years of sales tax due to the State, we prevailed.

New company, 10 years later.  The exact same audit. The exact same issues. So you have to ask, "Has the issue of what is specifically taxable in our industry not been resolved by now?  Can they not just give us a definition of what is taxable and when?" Its not like we are charging tax and putting it in our pockets.  If its taxable, we will collect tax. If its not, we don't want to burn our clients.  Their questions are a lot of nonsense.  I can urge you to not get involved in those nuances with the auditors.  They already know the answers. 

We were nice this time around for the first 1.5 years of the argument.  You heard it right...1.5 years of submittals, resubmittals, appeals, etc. We ended up with a hard-core lawyer driving to Tallahassee to talk to the supervisors. After that encounter, the State decided that we were right...never mind the whole thing!

15 years or so ago, the Florida advertising industry recognized the same shakedown from the State.  They got together and formed a lobby group.  They managed to get the legislature to mandate that the Department of Revenue write specific rules about what is taxable and what it not taxable in their industry. There has not been a shakedown issue in their industry since then.

For now, I would advise anyone to not deal with the auditors directly.  Being nice and cooperative is not going to help you. Hire a good, hard-nosed attorney as soon as they walk in the door. You'll save money and time in the long run.

The best thing MSP Alliance could do for us is to help us form a lobby group to do what the advertising industry did. 

Lobby Group

Great insights...thanks for sharing with the rest of the membership. We are already forming such a committee that can address these issues. We will keep you posted!

DOR has attempted to collect sales tax on all of our services...

Celia,The DOR has attempted to collect sales tax on all of our services in an audit last year.  They tried this to one of my other competitors in the panhandle too.  We finally convinced them that we are not "servicing tangible personal property" (which is subject to taxation).  But they are hitting us pretty hard.

MSPAlliance Member 

Is hardware as a service causing the sales tax trigger?

More members weighing in- some say that hardware as a service may trigger a sales tax on managed services in some states. Charles is speaking to someone as I'm typing this to get more clarification on how MSPs can formulate their contracts to avoid this- more details to come. 

Our Solution

**This is not legal advice.**

 We had a customer call us who was going through a state audit. They called us to tell me we needed to start charging them tax for our monthly maintenance plan. 

It seems the auditor thinks the word 'maintenance' includes replacing parts for free, like on an air-conditioner contract or like DELLs hardware warranty.

I removed the word 'maintenance' from our invoice and called it either 'pre-paid technical support' or 'monthly helpdesk service' or anything other than 'Gold Maintenance Plan- 50 workstations'.

However, as i understand it, if your monthly invoice does cover service AND parts, then the WHOLE invoice would be taxed. In that case, you may want to send separate invoices on separate days.

 Hope this helps.

**This is not legal advice.**

James San Filippo, MBA, BSIT, MCP
Business Sales/Service
Data Cube Systems

james@datacubesystems.com
www.datacubesystems.com

Microsoft Gold Certified Partner

 

Good way to get busted

They will come in and put together the two invoices during an audit and then extrapolate it to ALL of your invoices for the audit period.  Voila!  You're out of business. Just charge the tax if you are covering parts or selling hardware with the transaction.

RE: Possible tax issue facing FL MSPs

*Please note* We will be continually posting updates here as we get them, so check back often.

What we've heard so far is that an auditor from the FL State Department of Revenue has allegedly told an MSPAlliance Member going through an audit, that sales tax is owed on managed services contracts and not just on the service warranties associated with hardware sales.  

We're gathering information and speaking to other MSPs in FL and will be continually posting updates here. Please feel free to post your comments or questions and/or share any information you may have regarding this issue here so that we can all share in the knowledge. 

 

Managed Services as Service Warranties?

This is an advisement from the state of FL. 

"QUESTION: Whether the peering, cross connect, managed router, and managed services are subject to sales and use tax.

ANSWER: The peering, cross connect, and managed router services provide for the transmission of data only, and do not include the sale or rental of any tangible personal property or real property; therefore, these services are not subject to sales and use tax. The colocation services, consisting of the lease of real property used for storage of a customer’s equipment, and sales of tangible personal property are subject to sales and use tax. The managed services are subject to sales and use tax under Chapter 212, F.S., as the sale of a service warranty.

October 17, 2008"

Ok - so it looks like the state of FL is trying to make a case that service warranties (which can legitimately be taxed in FL) are the same as managed services, if the managed service includes tangible personal property (this is according to F.S. 212). 

If you agree that typical managed services contracts cover the data on the network and not necessarily the hardware/software, then there is going to be a problem as more and more states (like FL) try and increase their revenues by taxing managed services contracts. 

One thing to consider (if you currently do this) is the bundling of hardware and services. If you do this you may be asking for an audit. Maybe the separation of hardware from managed services contracts is the best thing to do.

Please note this is not to be taken as legal or accounting advice. Please speak with your accountant or tax attorney for advice concerning this subject.  

RE: Sales tax on managed services?

From an anonymous member: "We went through one in 2008 and our understanding is that if we are doing service only there is no tax. As soon as any part is invoiced, then the entire amount becomes taxable. So we make sure that we bill a separate invoice whenever any parts are involved. We do not include any parts on any of our agreements."

Florida Sales Tax, Service Contracts, MSPs and HaaS

So me of what is on here is correct. In Florida, whether or not PARTS are involved is the key trigger. Someone said, "If your monthly invoice DOES COVER service AND parts, then the WHOLE invoice would be taxed." That is correct. You could also have two invoices, ONE for a support ONLY contract and ONE for Hardware Warranty which needs to include the labor to support that hardware warranty. If the State of Florida figured out that you are installing the replacement parts using the support only contract - the WHOLE thing becomes taxable.

The person who said, "we make sure that we bill a separate invoice whenever any parts are involved"...this will NOT work. In a State of Florida Sales and Use Tax audit, they will figure this out. The Florida Department of Revenue will tell you that if I sell you "stuff" and within 30 days, I go back to install that stuff...my labor is taxable. If you sell lots of stuff and labor to the same client, you'd better be able to prove that the labor is in no way associated to the sale of stuff. Otherwise, the WHOLE thing is taxable.

They always explain it with a very simpel example: If I wax your car using YOUR wax, I have provided no product, so I do not charge you tax. If I wax your car using MY wax, the whole thing becomes taxable because (technically) you are getting a product in conjunction with the service.

In MSP you need to be selling an MSP contract that is support only. You can then sell a separate Parts & Labor Warranty contract, if you'd like. It's taxable because you might have to provide parts as part of it.

The big question is going to be around HaaS and/or other hosted or "cloud based" services. Those are just services. The customer never gets any product. However, Florida's Tax is a Sales & Use Tax. When you rent a car, obviously you don't end up with a product, you are just using it. There's tax on that. The question is, for example, Hosted Exchange...is that taxable?

I also do Business in Connecticut, it's taxable there. Connecticut specifically states that all Internet based services, where the benefit of the service is being experienced by a user in Connecticut needs to be taxed (and sent to them). They don't care if there's a product involved or not. So what about anti-spam? I have servers (in Florida) that take email, weed out the spam, and then deliver clean email to my customers in Florida, Georgia, Connecticut and other places. Is that taxable?

I'm not even asking about HaaS, I'm sure that's taxable (now or in the near future).

Cheers
- Rory

My Business Model Shift (circa 2007)

This is not a new issue facing FL MSP's (the enforcement of it might be however)

When I faced this issue with sales and use tax. I immediately turned it into a client benefit. I now outsource large procurement to Axis Business Solutions and small purchases I refer to Amazon.

In both these scenario's I have an affiliate relationship whereby the company earns a commission on referred sales. By outsourcing the procurement in this way I maintain a 100% services business and which is not taxable (currently)

Using outsourced procurement also takes away the burden of using non-billable time to produce quotations and estimates.

I sell it as a differentiator to my clients in that by doing the purchasing themselves they save 7% sales tax from my invoices. And of course this reduces my administrative overhead with the state.

I am a one-man-band at the moment and this methodology works quite well for me.

All the best

Dominic